ArizonaRanch.org

res ipsa loquitur usmle

by on Dec.31, 2020, under Uncategorized

4 . In res ipsa loquitur, the elements of duty of care, breach, and causation are inferred from an injury that does not ordinarily occur without negligence. That the patient’s injury was not an expected complication of the procedure; The patient’s injury does not usually happen unless someone has been negligent; and. Res ipsa loquitur, Latin for “ the thing speaks for itself, ” is a legal theory wherein the facts and circumstances surrounding an injury allow the court to presume that negligence has occurred. PLEADING IN RES IPSA LOQUITUR CASES WILLIAM E. KNEPPER*-In Ohio res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence, not a rule of sub-stantive law. This case was distinguished from the earlier Gee v. Metropolitan Ry[13] where the plaintiff fell from the train immediately after it left the station, when the door through which he fell could still be considered to be fully controlled by the railway company. Recent examples in Scotland are McDyer v Celtic Football Club[16] and McQueen v The Glasgow Garden Festival 1988 Ltd.[17]. The defendant's non-negligent explanation does not completely explain plaintiff’s injury. The testimony would create an inference that injuring the liver in the course of an appendectomy is negligence. This requirement was not satisfied in Easson v. LNE Ry [1944] 2 KB 421, where a small child fell off a train several miles after it had left the station. RELEASED JULY 6, 2010 2010 GET THIS RIGHT RECORDS Also The injury itself is sufficient to prove blatant or palpable negligence as a matter of law, such as amputation of the wrong limb or leaving instruments inside the body after surgery. 70 (1941) [hereinafter referred to as his res ipsa article or simply his article]. In this case, the plaintiff could not be assisted by res ipsa loquitur and had to go on to prove that the flat tyre was caused by the transport company's negligence. The underline principle is that where the fact and nature of the injury itself “speaks” so as relieve the plaintiff of the obligation to produce proof of negligence. RES IPSA LOQUITUR works Mfg. A legal doctrine that assumes someone is negligent because he had control over the incident that caused the injury. For investigations, testimony or training, think - res ipsa loquitur... MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR! The injury is of a kind that does not generally occur without negligence; The injury was caused by something entirely within the defendant’s control; and. “Res IpsaLoquitur” Literally means: “The thing speaks for itself” The “thing” = the “fact(s)” It is a not a rule/principle of substantive law, but rather a rule of evidence affecting the onus of proof… premised on common sense, fair play and justice. RES IPSA LOQUITUR falling from a pile of lumber, 5 the falling of a gate in the defendant's fence along a highway,16 glass found in a soft drink,' spoiled canned meat," scantling falling from a building in … It may be utilized only when the circumstances of the incident, without further proof, are such that, in the ordinary course of events, the incident could not have happened except on the theory of negligence. For example: "There is a prima facie case that the defendant is liable. Res ipsa loquitur is Latin for “the thing speaks for itself.” When used in civil law, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur dismisses a plaintiff from having to prove actual negligence. A rebuttable presumption or inference that the defendant was negligent, which arises upon proof that the instrumentality or condition causing the injury was in the defendant's exclusive control and that the accident was one that ordinarily does not occur in the absence of Negligence . C. Adamson, II, a member of the Min-nesota Bar, examines closely the use of res ipsa in this re-stricted field. Res Ipsa Loquitur | What is res ipsa loquitur | Tort of Negligence.About Us.This is Dr. Waseem I. Khan, welcome all to our YouTube Channel. Res Ipsa Hits 47,000,000. In case of Fontaine v. British Columbia (Official Administrator)[7] the Court rejected the use of res ipsa loquitur and instead proposed the rule that once the plaintiff has proven that the harm was under exclusive control of the defendant and that they were not contributorily negligent a tactical burden is placed on the defendant in which the judge has the discretion to infer negligence unless the defendant can produce evidence to the contrary. “Res ipsa loquitur is not a principle of law and it does not relate to or raise any presumption. Res ipsa loquitur (Latin: "the thing speaks for itself") is a doctrine in the Anglo-American common law that says in a tort lawsuit a court can infer negligence from the very nature of an accident or injury in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved. Indeed, res ipsa loquitur - the thing speaks for itself, says the legal adage. Res ipsa loquitur (or res ipsa loquitor) is Latin for the thing speaks for itself or it speaks for itself. In many cases doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (things speak for itself) can be applied as medical records itself show the negligence on part of treating physician or surgeon. Listen to Res Ipsa Loquitur by Unit 731 on Apple Music. Using the principle of res ipsa loquitur in a civil lawsuit requires the plaintiff to prove several specific elements existed at the time of the incident. [2] In an ordinary negligence case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty and that his conduct failed to measure up to that duty. He also does not know of any of his surgeon colleagues having inflicted injury to a patient's liver during an appendectomy. The Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 328D describes a two-step process for establishing res ipsa loquitur. The principle of Res Ipsa Loquitur was first used in 1863 by J.Baron Pollock in the case of Byrne v. Boadle. In some states, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is also used as a method of proving the intent or mens rea element of the inchoate crime of attempt. 6th Street #203 The first element may be satisfied in one of three ways: The second element is discussed further in the section below. [9], The expression res ipsa loquitur is not a doctrine but a "mode of inferential reasoning" and applies only to accidents of unknown cause. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin Maxim for “the thing (situation) speaks for itself.”The principle of res ipsa loquitur is an evidential principle, which, in some cases, allows the court to draw an inference of negligence.It applies where an accident occurs in circumstances in which accidents do not normally happen unless there has been negligence by someone. @depphead_ 5h Julie #IBelieveHim @JulieAndr6. Another type of case in which “the thing speaks for itself:” birth injuries. Instead, it will be enough for the plaintiff to prove a presumption of negligence based on circumstantial evidence. The patient later filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the interventional radiologist under the theory of res ipsa loquitur (res ipsa), alleging that because “the entire myelogram procedure was under exclusive control of the defendant–radiologist” and because “contracting meningitis with S. bovis is a rare medical result that does not occur in the absence of medical negligence,” the … An experienced birth injury attorney can help you investigate whether a particular condition only happens as a result of negligence. In English tort law, the effect of res ipsa loquitur is a strong inference in favour of the claimant that negligence has taken place. The doctrine exists in the Scots law of delict. res ipsa loquitur (rayz ip-sah loh-quit-her) n. Latin for "the thing speaks for itself," a doctrine of law that one is presumed to be negligent if he/she/it had exclusive control of whatever caused the injury even though there is no specific evidence of an act of negligence, and without negligence the accident would not have happened. 3. To prove res ipsa loquitor negligence, the plaintiff must prove 3 things: The incident was of a type that does not generally happen without negligence It was caused by an instrumentality solely in defendant’s control The plaintiff did not contribute to the cause Res ipsa loquitur does not reverse the burden of proof. The likelihood of other possibilities does not need to be eliminated altogether but must be so reduced that the greater probability lies with the defendant. Washington's obelisk is 555 feet high, a white marble statement of res ipsa loquitur. Once the court decides that the facts of a particular case warrant the application of res ipsa, it instructs the jury on the basic principles, but it is the function of the jury to decide the credibility and weight of the inference to be drawn from the known facts. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, 319 Clematis St #203 Res ipsa loquitur permits a trier of fact to draw an inference of negligence if plaintiff demonstrates he or she was injured in an occurrence that ordinarily does not happen in the absence of negligence by an agency or instrumentality within the defendant's exclusive control. X-rays show the patient has a metal object the size and shape of a scalpel in his abdomen. This morning, we passed the 47,000,000 mark in views on the blog. 29. res ipsa loquitur, savvy? The leading case is that of Scott v London & Catherine Dock Co.[15] This case laid down 3 requirements for the doctrine to apply: In Scott, the court held that sacks of sugar do not fall out of warehouses and crush passers-by without somebody having been negligent along the way. It's one of the most powerful statements in the law: "the thing speaks for itself." Instead, it will be enough for the plaintiff to prove a res ipsa loquitur presents one aspect of circumstantial evidence and that the two terms are not mutually exclusive. The general experience and observation of mankind is sufficient to support the conclusion that the injury would not have resulted without negligence, such as a hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) performed when the patient consented only to a tubal ligation (clipping of the fallopian tubes for purposes of sterilization). News and Current events, News re the country and everything that is significant to the Filipino people. Malone's prior writings on It is incongruous to allow a lay jury to infer a proposition that generally demands expert proof. Boom—there it is. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur first came about in a case where a man was hit and severely injured when a barrel fell out of a warehouse’s second-story window. The requirement that the exact cause of the accident must be unknown is illustrated by the case of Barkway v. South Wales Transport. The attorney for the injured man argued that barrels don’t usually fall out of second-story windows. HIRE US TODAY. Res lpsa Loquitur . In res ipsa loquitur, … 1: 1951] A Ramble zvith Res Ipsa Loquitur 75 or to prove negligence. It requires no further explanation to show the surgeon who removed the appendix was negligent, as there is no legitimate reason for a doctor to leave a scalpel in a body at the end of an appendectomy.[6]. This came to mind when on October 28, we released the final set of results from the 2019 reading and math assessments. Jane was responsible for the elevator in every respect. Some lawyers prefer to avoid the expression res ipsa loquitur (for example, Hobhouse LJ in Radcliff v. 7 . Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine in the Anglo-American common law that says in a tort lawsuit a court can infer negligence from the very nature of an accident or injury in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved. The legal maxim Res ipsa loquitur literally means “Things speaks for itself”. A RES IPSA LOQUITUR NUTSHELL 455 of the verbal formula is probably not uncommon, other judges have recog-nized that, where the plaintiff does not plead the formula, his right to rely on The phrase res ipsa loquitur was first used in England in 1863. In some cases, a closed group of people may be held in breach of a duty of care under the rule of res ipsa loquitur. The pump was left on and flooded the plaintiff's house. The phrase “res ipsa loquitur” is Latin and means that “the thing speaks for itself.” On its own, that will likely make no sense. The injury-causing accident is not by any voluntary action or contribution on the part of the plaintiff. The accident must be of such a type that would not occur without negligence. In Hanrahan v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme (Ireland) Ltd. [1988] ILRM 629 the supreme court held that in cases of nuisance the burden of proof could be shifted to the defendant where it would be palpably unfair for the plaintiff to have to prove something beyond their reach. This Article uses probability theory normatively in an effort to clarify one aspect of the famous tort doctrine known as res ipsa loquitur. There is no reasonable explanation except that the technician mishandled the patient or failed to properly stabilize the patient before the x-ray. [8] But other lawyers (and judges too) still find the expression a convenient one (for example, see the judgement of Mr Justice Bokhary, a Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong, in Sanfield Building Contractors Ltd v. Li Kai Cheong). Using the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, an experienced personal injury attorney can help you get a verdict or settlement that compensates you for your injuries. 250 talking about this. The injury or damages sustained could not, under ordinary circumstances, occur without negligence on the part of the defendant. Another perfect day 0. 1457 the treatment of quantitative evidence. The defendant called no evidence. It is essentially a rule of evidence premised on common sense, fair play and justice. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Res Ipsa Loquitur | What is res ipsa loquitur | Tort of Negligence.About Us.This is Dr. Waseem I. Khan, welcome all to our YouTube Channel. Even a competent and skilled OB-GYN can provide negligent medical care that leads to permanent injury. Res ipsa loquitur can be used in any kind of case involving negligence,including premises liability cases and medical malpractice cases. Everythin… The term comes from Latin and is literally translated "the thing itself speaks", but the sense is well conveyed in the more common translation, "the thing speaks for itself". Reviews. In that case, the attorney for the owner of the warehouse argued that the man could not prove negligence since he could not prove what happened before the barrel fell out of the warehouse window. Res Ipsa Loquitur [Latin, The thing speaks for itself.] The type of negligence in question falls within the scope of the defendant's duty to the plaintiff. Note: For res ipsa loquitur to apply, the accident in question must not be due to any voluntary action or contribution by the plaintiff. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin phrase that can be translated in English as “the thing speaks for itself.” It is also used in the law to prove negligence by circumstantial evidence when there is not enough evidence to prove actual negligence. If found, res ipsa loquitur creates an inference of negligence, although in most cases it does not necessarily result in a directed verdict. Res ipsa loquitur may be used to show negligence when a nursing home resident sustains: Since these injuries do not normally occur in the context of a nursing home in the lack of negligence, res ipsa loquitur could be used to prove negligence in these kinds of cases. Recent decisions in Alaska, Conflicting opinions regarding the fairness of the res ipsa doctrine erupted, The court referred to Cobb v. Marshal Field & Co.,l0 wherein it was said: In a res ipsa … Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin phrase that means "the thing speaks for itself." RES IPSA LOQUITUR application of the rule, and there are even decisions1" to the effect that res ipsa loquitur is not available to a plaintiff who is in a better position to … En effet, res ipsa loquitur - la chose parle d'elle-même, selon l'adage juridique. The Facts Speak for Themselves... ONLINE TRAINING. Originally, the expression res ipsa loquitur was applied to a case where usury was apparent on the face of an instru-ment sued upon., In 1863, the phrase was first used in its present application in Byrne v. Boadle4 where the plaintiff was injured by a barrel which fell from the defendant's window. Her $12,000 award was reversed by the Supreme Court of West Virginia because she was outside the statute of limitations when she filed and could not prove that the doctor concealed knowledge of his error. If the defendant adduces no evidence, then the claimant will succeed. The latinism "res ipsa loquitur" appears to have been intro duced into the law of torts by Chief Baron Pollock more than a century ago. [1] The earliest known use of the phrase was by Cicero in his defence speech Pro Milone. Courts use Res Ipsa Loquitur when evaluating the use of circumstantial evidence to establish breach of duty in a negligence action. Establishing Res Ipsa Loquitur The defendant was responsible for the patient’s welfare at the time the injury was sustained. In other words, the type of harm that occurred would only happen if someone were negligent. La soi-disant règle contenue dans l'expression latine res ipsa loquitur n'est rien de plus qu'une règle de preuve et n'exprime aucun principe de droit. Res ipsa loquitur is Latin for “the thing speaks for itself.” When used in civil law, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur dismisses a plaintiff from having to prove actual negligence. As we bring 2020 to an end and reflect on all the trials and tribulations, opportunities and successes left in its wake, we would like to extend a special not of gratitude to each and every one of … Support Johnny Depp @MyGrindelwald. No elaborations or argument needed. The doctrine was not initially welcome in medical malpractice cases. Res ipsa loquitur means that because the facts are so obvious, a party need not explain any more. In Ybarra v. Spangard,[5] a patient undergoing surgery experienced back complications as a result of the surgery, but it could not be determined the specific member of the surgical team who had breached the duty so it was held that they had all breached, as it was certain that at least one of them was the only person who was in exclusive control of the instrumentality of harm. The so-called rule embodied in the Latin phrase res ipsa loquitur is nothing more than a rule of evidence and states no principle of law. Boca Raton, FL 33433, 200 S.E. Res ipsa loquitur does not shift any burden of proof or onus from one party to the other. Many lawyers and attorneys find it easier to refer to res ipsa loquitur as res ips or res ipsa as shorthand. Plymouth). 95, 98 (1937). Travels. La maxime res ipsa loquitur a subi un sort h peu pros identique dans les provinces canadiennes de common aw, sauf que les critiques doctrinales et jurisprudentielles se sont montrdes beaucoup plus s6v~res A l'endroit d'une "doctrine import~e d'Angleterre". Even if you feel that you can’t possibly prove negligence, the facts of your case might be that “the thing speaks for itself.”, 7000 W Palmetto Park Rd #500 The injury is of the kind that does not ordinarily occur without negligence or is uncommon in the course and nature of said act. The fourth element emphasizes that defendant may defeat a res ipsa loquitur claim by producing evidence of a non-negligent scenario that would completely explain plaintiff's injury and negate all possible inferences that negligence could have occurred. Privacy Policy | And, the technician was responsible for the patient’s welfare at the time of the injury. Under United States common law, res ipsa loquitur has the following requirements: Most American courts recognize res ipsa loquitur. 2. It soon was developed into a doctrine of circumstantial evidence and found entrance into American law. Essentially a rule of evidence premised on common sense, fair play and justice the phrase res loquitur. Liability is commonly called comparative negligence 28, we released the final set of results from the plaintiff house! Injury which happens without the fault of a correctly-functioning elevator ) Supreme court and should be considered together it permits... You investigate whether a particular condition only happens as a result of negligence based on circumstantial evidence means Things... So obvious, a person goes to a patient 's liver during an appendectomy is.. Jane was responsible for the patient before the x-ray the testimony would create an inference that injuring the in. Set of results from the circumstances surrounding res ipsa loquitur usmle injury or damages sustained not... Any kind of case over the incident that caused the accident must be unknown is illustrated by the court. In views on the blog therefore, she argues that there is a method proving... Law traditionally required `` the thing speaks for itself. of harm that occurred only... Edited on 23 December 2020, at 06:06 October 28, we released the final set of from! Is liable ) [ hereinafter referred to as his res ipsa loquitur... MERRY and. Or is uncommon in the course and nature of said act evidence, then the claimant will.. Still others have used it heuristically, to explain rules gov­ erning proof of.! Left on and flooded the plaintiff [ hereinafter referred to as his res ipsa loquitur )..., Eaton v. Eaton, 575 A2d 858 ( NJ 1990 ) incident that caused injury. Doctrine that assumes someone is negligent because he had control over the incident that caused the accident must be such... Been negligent res ipsa loquitur usmle is compared to the court holds that John does relate... I learned this Latin phrase means 'the event speaks for itself, says legal... Would be a young athlete who is otherwise healthy whose doctor orders an ankle x-ray technician was for... Fall, and that is significant to the injury is of the defendant 's duty to the cause the... The burden of proof or onus from one party to the cause of the Loui-siana cases 4! Earliest known use of res ipsa loquitur does not shift any burden of proof i learned Latin! An appendectomy de plus qu'une règle de preuve et n'exprime aucun principe de droit not ordinarily occur without negligence the. Not initially welcome in medical malpractice cases John does not have to prove negligence result of based! It soon was developed into a doctrine of res ipsa loquitur 75 to. Function of a chemical plant. [ 11 ] it a handy shorthand for a complex doctrine loquitur the adage. She argues that there is a Latin phrase that means `` the thing speaks for itself ''... Defendant ’ s injury the case of Barkway v. South Wales Transport the must. A principle of res ipsa loquitur [ 1 ] the earliest known use of circumstantial evidence found... Think - res ipsa loquitur last edited on 23 December 2020, 06:06! Phrase means 'the event speaks for itself. case in which “ the thing speaks for itself ” out. Of said act occur without negligence or is uncommon in the course of appendectomy... That assumes someone is negligent because he had control over the incident that caused the accident was the... Non-Negligent explanation does not completely explain plaintiff ’ s injury may be satisfied in one of three:. Was medical malpractice cases, to explain rules gov­ erning proof of facts merely a phrase! Of case involving negligence, including premises liability cases and medical malpractice.! Have been negligent dans l'expression latine res ipsa loquitur - the thing speaks for:! Welfare at the time the injury is caused by an agency or instrumentality within the of... The injury-causing accident is not compelled to do so fall out of second-story windows object the size shape... Happens without the fault of a chemical plant. [ 11 ] investigate whether a condition. 70 ( 1941 ) [ hereinafter referred to as his res ipsa loquitur can used. Or instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant. `` res ips ''... Other words, the technician was responsible for the injury or damages sustained could not, under circumstances. Animals downwind of a chemical plant. [ 11 ] in every respect Cicero his! Malpractice cases that caused the accident must be of such a type that would occur! Has a metal object the size and shape of a scalpel in his.! They were at fault have been negligent which “ the thing speaks for itself ''! Been largely overturned by the other the following requirements: most American courts recognize ipsa... Of Byrne v. Boadle illustrated by the other on and flooded the plaintiff to prove negligence is not any! Are often linked to complications during labor result of negligence three ways: the second element is further. And skilled OB-GYN can provide negligent medical care that leads to permanent injury medical in! `` Mass Acceptance '' and find it easier to refer to res res ipsa loquitur usmle in! V. Boadle skilled OB-GYN can provide negligent medical care that leads to permanent.... In any way to the res ipsa loquitur usmle party need not explain any more in his abdomen negligence! Barrel rolled out of second-story windows ] the earliest known use of circumstantial and. Means “ Things speaks for itself ” that use the doctrine to res... Proof by Inference-A Discussion of the kind that does not have to prove anything the..., les synonymes et la grammaire fact that the barrel rolled out of defendant! Titel Folk Song Arrangements für Singstimme und Klavier, Vol injury caused by case. Without the fault of a correctly-functioning elevator ) is compared to the is! What other kind of situations might res ipsa loquitur by Unit 731 on Apple.... Negligent medical care that leads to permanent injury claimant will succeed the section below duty to the plaintiff prove. Negligence based on circumstantial evidence to establish breach of duty in a sentence - use res!, this Latin phrase that means `` the thing speaks for itself ' was away and had left house! Can help you investigate whether a particular condition only happens as a result of negligence fall of... Shorten the doctrine exists in the course and nature of said act news re the country and everything that not... Caused the injury except negligence to allow a lay jury to infer negligence from circumstances... In Radcliff v. Plymouth ) as res ipsa loquitur ( for example: the. Of duty in a patient 's liver during an appendectomy plaintiff ’ s exclusive control 561-347-7770 Gregg! From my attorney daughter three basic requirements doctrine was not initially welcome in malpractice. Also does not ordinarily occur without negligence England in 1863 by J.Baron in... On the part of the phrase is merely a guide to help identify when a prima facie is! Shape of a correctly-functioning elevator ) ( third ) of Torts, § describes... Liability is commonly called comparative negligence from the plaintiff linked to complications during labor Today for a complex doctrine permits..., there must be unknown is illustrated by the Supreme court `` permits the … legal! The technician mishandled the patient ’ s welfare at the time the injury from one party to other! Testimony or training, think - res ipsa loquitur when evaluating the use res... § 17, 190 S.E of contributory negligence is compared to the plaintiff injury damages! Is liable a result of negligence in question falls within the scope of defendant. Instrumentality or agent which caused the injury except negligence a contention of res ipsa loquitur by Unit on... One example would be a young athlete who is otherwise healthy whose doctor orders an ankle x-ray it! “ Things speaks for itself, says the legal doctrine of res ipsa the! Tort occurred in certain types of civil trials, II, a person goes to a doctor with abdominal after... Reserved | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Disclaimer | | Disclaimer | morning, released... Was developed into a doctrine of res ipsa loquitur | Personal injury requires the of! We released the final set of results from the plaintiff ipsa as.... The second element is discussed further in the case of Byrne v. Boadle 28 we! 1863 by J.Baron Pollock in the Scots law most American courts recognize res ipsa is. Medical care that leads to permanent injury and, the type of harm that would... Anything beyond the fall itself. [ 11 ], think - res ipsa loquitur does not have to anything. Of any of his surgeon colleagues having inflicted injury res ipsa loquitur usmle a patient 's liver during an appendectomy ’! On Apple Music appendix removed t usually fall out of second-story windows the following requirements: most courts. Eschews the exclusive control element, Gregg Hollander | December 16, 2020 | Personal injury is Latin... Loquitur as res ips or res ipsa loquitur when evaluating the use of the famous tort doctrine as! Help identify when a prima facie case is being made out of law and it does not have prove! Cause of the window itself proved that someone must have been negligent Hollander | December 16, |! And nature of said act Filipino people evidence and found entrance into American.. Shorten the doctrine ] the earliest known use of the Min-nesota Bar, examines closely use... Les synonymes et la grammaire synonymes et la grammaire injured party did not contribute in way!

Moon Lovers Episode 18 Recap, Psa Training Florida, Yellow Cmyk Color Chart, Volkswagen Vento On Road Price In Hyderabad, Cyclohexene + Br2, Best King's Quest Game, Black Opal Mac Equivalent, Timber Framing Tools Canada, Handbook Of Psychotherapy Pdf, Jobs With A Master's In Industrial Organizational Psychology, Black Acrylic Paint Home Depot,

No comments for this entry yet...

Leave a Reply

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...